BISCUIT THINS vs OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BISCUIT THINS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BISCUIT THINS: 5
vs
OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BISCUIT THINS | OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 455 cal | 455 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 13.6 g | 9.1 g | |
| Carbs | 59.1 g | 72.7 g | |
| Fat | 18.2 g | 15.9 g | |
| Fiber | 6.8 g | 4.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BISCUIT THINS | OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BISCUIT THINS | OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 45 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 1.6 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 477 MG | 432 MG |