BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE vs COTTONDALE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE: 6
vs
COTTONDALE: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | COTTONDALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 545 cal | 535 cal | |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 2.3 g | |
| Carbs | 51.5 g | 67.4 g | |
| Fat | 36.4 g | 30.2 g | |
| Fiber | 9.1 g | 2.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | COTTONDALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | COTTONDALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 61 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.5 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 545 MG | 58 MG |