BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE vs GRASS FED DARK CHOCOLATE COCOA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GRASS FED DARK CHOCOLATE COCOA wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE: 2
vs
GRASS FED DARK CHOCOLATE COCOA: 8
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | GRASS FED DARK CHOCOLATE COCOA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 485 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 3.0 g | 71.4 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fat | 24.2 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 6.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | GRASS FED DARK CHOCOLATE COCOA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | GRASS FED DARK CHOCOLATE COCOA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 61 MG | 357 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.4 MG | 6.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 714 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 30 MG | 161 MG |