BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE vs SANDERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE: 4
vs
SANDERS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | SANDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 545 cal | 368 cal | |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 2.6 g | |
| Carbs | 54.6 g | 52.6 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 21.1 g | |
| Fiber | 6.1 g | 2.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | SANDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | SANDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 61 MG | 53 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.5 MG | 2.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 263 MG |