BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE vs MINT CHOCOLATE MELTS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE: 5
vs
MINT CHOCOLATE MELTS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | MINT CHOCOLATE MELTS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 545 cal | 517 cal | |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 6.9 g | |
| Carbs | 54.6 g | 58.6 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 34.5 g | |
| Fiber | 6.1 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | MINT CHOCOLATE MELTS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | MINT CHOCOLATE MELTS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 61 MG | 172 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.5 MG | 3.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 352 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 69 MG |