BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE vs ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE: 5
vs
ALMONDS: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 545 cal | 556 cal | |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 11.1 g | |
| Carbs | 51.5 g | 44.4 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 40.7 g | |
| Fiber | 9.1 g | 3.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 61 MG | 159 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.5 MG | 3.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 467 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 37 MG |