BING CHERRIES vs COLOSSAL CASHEWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COLOSSAL CASHEWS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BING CHERRIES: 4
vs
COLOSSAL CASHEWS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BING CHERRIES | COLOSSAL CASHEWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 475 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 60 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fiber | 7.5 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BING CHERRIES | COLOSSAL CASHEWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BING CHERRIES | COLOSSAL CASHEWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 6.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 500 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 375 MG |