BELGIAN DARK CHOCOLATE ENROBED GRAHAM vs WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA SOFT BAKED COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BELGIAN DARK CHOCOLATE ENROBED GRAHAM wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BELGIAN DARK CHOCOLATE ENROBED GRAHAM: 5
vs
WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA SOFT BAKED COOKIES: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BELGIAN DARK CHOCOLATE ENROBED GRAHAM | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA SOFT BAKED COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 59.1 g | 53.6 g | |
| Fat | 27.3 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BELGIAN DARK CHOCOLATE ENROBED GRAHAM | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA SOFT BAKED COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 91 MG | 21 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 8.2 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 318 MG | 71 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 182 MG | 411 MG |