BEEF TAMALES WRAPPED IN TRADITIONAL CORN HUSKS vs MONTEREY MUSHROOMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
BEEF TAMALES WRAPPED IN TRADITIONAL CORN HUSKS: 5
vs
MONTEREY MUSHROOMS: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF TAMALES WRAPPED IN TRADITIONAL CORN HUSKS | MONTEREY MUSHROOMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 177 cal | 97 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 15.9 g | 6.2 g | |
| Fat | 10.6 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF TAMALES WRAPPED IN TRADITIONAL CORN HUSKS | MONTEREY MUSHROOMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF TAMALES WRAPPED IN TRADITIONAL CORN HUSKS | MONTEREY MUSHROOMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 73 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 53 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 434 MG | 265 MG |