BEEF SWEET & SNAPPY vs CHINESE NOODLES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF SWEET & SNAPPY wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF SWEET & SNAPPY: 6
vs
CHINESE NOODLES: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF SWEET & SNAPPY | CHINESE NOODLES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 35.7 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 28.6 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF SWEET & SNAPPY | CHINESE NOODLES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF SWEET & SNAPPY | CHINESE NOODLES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.1 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,286 MG | 500 MG |