BEEF FRANKS IN NATURAL CASING vs SCHALLER & WEBER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SCHALLER & WEBER wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF FRANKS IN NATURAL CASING: 2
vs
SCHALLER & WEBER: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FRANKS IN NATURAL CASING | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 122 cal | |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 18.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.3 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 22.7 g | 3.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FRANKS IN NATURAL CASING | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FRANKS IN NATURAL CASING | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 22 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 840 MG | 711 MG |