BEEF FRANKS vs KALE & FETA HARDWOOD SMOKED CHICKEN SAUSAGES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KALE & FETA HARDWOOD SMOKED CHICKEN SAUSAGES wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEEF FRANKS: 3
vs
KALE & FETA HARDWOOD SMOKED CHICKEN SAUSAGES: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FRANKS | KALE & FETA HARDWOOD SMOKED CHICKEN SAUSAGES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 310 cal | 188 cal | |
| Protein | 11.5 g | 16.5 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 2.4 g | |
| Fat | 27.4 g | 11.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FRANKS | KALE & FETA HARDWOOD SMOKED CHICKEN SAUSAGES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 5.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FRANKS | KALE & FETA HARDWOOD SMOKED CHICKEN SAUSAGES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 159 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 912 MG | 741 MG |