BEEF FRANKS vs SWEET ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE WITH KALE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE WITH KALE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF FRANKS: 2
vs
SWEET ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE WITH KALE: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FRANKS | SWEET ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE WITH KALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 320 cal | 186 cal | |
| Protein | 12 g | 18.6 g | |
| Carbs | 2 g | 2.9 g | |
| Fat | 30 g | 10 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FRANKS | SWEET ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE WITH KALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FRANKS | SWEET ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE WITH KALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,100 MG | 814 MG |