BEEF FRANKS vs BUN-LENGTH TURKEY UNCURED FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUN-LENGTH TURKEY UNCURED FRANKS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF FRANKS: 2
vs
BUN-LENGTH TURKEY UNCURED FRANKS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FRANKS | BUN-LENGTH TURKEY UNCURED FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 211 cal | |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 10.5 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 5.3 g | |
| Fat | 26.8 g | 15.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FRANKS | BUN-LENGTH TURKEY UNCURED FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 6.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FRANKS | BUN-LENGTH TURKEY UNCURED FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 263 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,500 MG | 842 MG |