BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS vs SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS: 2
vs
SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS | SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 244 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 15.6 g | 23.2 g | |
| Carbs | 2.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS | SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS | SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 89 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 978 MG | 875 MG |