BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS vs CHICKEN BASIL & SUNDRIED TOMATO SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN BASIL & SUNDRIED TOMATO SAUSAGE wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS: 2
vs
CHICKEN BASIL & SUNDRIED TOMATO SAUSAGE: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS | CHICKEN BASIL & SUNDRIED TOMATO SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 244 cal | 125 cal | |
| Protein | 15.6 g | 19.0 g | |
| Carbs | 2.2 g | 2.1 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 3.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS | CHICKEN BASIL & SUNDRIED TOMATO SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 5.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS | CHICKEN BASIL & SUNDRIED TOMATO SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 89 MG | 21 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 978 MG | 663 MG |