BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS vs NIMAN RANCH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NIMAN RANCH wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 2
vs
NIMAN RANCH: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | NIMAN RANCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 304 cal | 224 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 15.3 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 23.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | NIMAN RANCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | NIMAN RANCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 982 MG | 941 MG |