BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS vs NATURAL CASING FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 3
vs
NATURAL CASING FRANKS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | NATURAL CASING FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 304 cal | 304 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 26.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | NATURAL CASING FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | NATURAL CASING FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 982 MG | 1,000 MG |