BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS vs BRATWURST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BRATWURST wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 3
vs
BRATWURST: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 304 cal | 253 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 16.5 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 4.4 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 18.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 331 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,143 MG | 571 MG |