BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO vs HARD SMOKED ST. LOUIS STYLE PORK RIBS WITH BBQ SAUCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO wins in 8 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO: 8
vs
HARD SMOKED ST. LOUIS STYLE PORK RIBS WITH BBQ SAUCE: 1
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | HARD SMOKED ST. LOUIS STYLE PORK RIBS WITH BBQ SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 306 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 13.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.4 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 20.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | HARD SMOKED ST. LOUIS STYLE PORK RIBS WITH BBQ SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.9 MG | 0.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | HARD SMOKED ST. LOUIS STYLE PORK RIBS WITH BBQ SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 29 MG | 22 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 343 MG | 450 MG |