BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO vs FULLY COOKED PORK BABY BACK RIBS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO: 7
vs
FULLY COOKED PORK BABY BACK RIBS: 1
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | FULLY COOKED PORK BABY BACK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 229 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 1.4 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 11.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | FULLY COOKED PORK BABY BACK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | FULLY COOKED PORK BABY BACK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 29 MG | 29 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 343 MG | 429 MG |