BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN MINI FRANKS CORN DOGS vs APPLE CRUMBLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN MINI FRANKS CORN DOGS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN MINI FRANKS CORN DOGS: 6
vs
APPLE CRUMBLE: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN MINI FRANKS CORN DOGS | APPLE CRUMBLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 276 cal | 316 cal | |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 2.6 g | |
| Carbs | 29.0 g | 36.8 g | |
| Fat | 14.5 g | 14.9 g | |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 0.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN MINI FRANKS CORN DOGS | APPLE CRUMBLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN MINI FRANKS CORN DOGS | APPLE CRUMBLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 645 MG | 263 MG |