BASIL PESTO ORGANIC CHICKEN SAUSAGE vs NATURAL CASING FRANKFORTS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BASIL PESTO ORGANIC CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BASIL PESTO ORGANIC CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 6
vs
NATURAL CASING FRANKFORTS: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BASIL PESTO ORGANIC CHICKEN SAUSAGE | NATURAL CASING FRANKFORTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 304 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BASIL PESTO ORGANIC CHICKEN SAUSAGE | NATURAL CASING FRANKFORTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BASIL PESTO ORGANIC CHICKEN SAUSAGE | NATURAL CASING FRANKFORTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 235 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 750 MG | 1,161 MG |