BARKEATER CHOCOLATES vs RICEMILK CRUNCH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BARKEATER CHOCOLATES wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BARKEATER CHOCOLATES: 6
vs
RICEMILK CRUNCH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BARKEATER CHOCOLATES | RICEMILK CRUNCH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 493 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 56.3 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 35.2 g | 35 g | |
| Fiber | 7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BARKEATER CHOCOLATES | RICEMILK CRUNCH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BARKEATER CHOCOLATES | RICEMILK CRUNCH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 28 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 7.6 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 7 MG | 100 MG |