BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING vs COLESLAW DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING: 4
vs
COLESLAW DRESSING: 0
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 167 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 10 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 13.3 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,500 MG | 567 MG |