BALSAMIC GLAZE vs PRICKLY DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PRICKLY DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
BALSAMIC GLAZE: 2
vs
PRICKLY DRESSING: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BALSAMIC GLAZE | PRICKLY DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 236 cal | 54 cal | |
| Protein | 1 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 56 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BALSAMIC GLAZE | PRICKLY DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 12.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BALSAMIC GLAZE | PRICKLY DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 47 MG | 0 MG |