BALSAMIC GLAZE vs NONCHIAMATEMIACETO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BALSAMIC GLAZE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
BALSAMIC GLAZE: 3
vs
NONCHIAMATEMIACETO: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BALSAMIC GLAZE | NONCHIAMATEMIACETO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 cal | 153 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 26.7 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BALSAMIC GLAZE | NONCHIAMATEMIACETO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BALSAMIC GLAZE | NONCHIAMATEMIACETO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 267 MG | 33 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 13 MG |