BACON-WRAPPED PORK SIRLOIN FILLETS vs TENDERLOIN 100% GRASS FED BEEF FILET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON-WRAPPED PORK SIRLOIN FILLETS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BACON-WRAPPED PORK SIRLOIN FILLETS: 5
vs
TENDERLOIN 100% GRASS FED BEEF FILET: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON-WRAPPED PORK SIRLOIN FILLETS | TENDERLOIN 100% GRASS FED BEEF FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 204 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 26.6 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 9.7 g | 18.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON-WRAPPED PORK SIRLOIN FILLETS | TENDERLOIN 100% GRASS FED BEEF FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON-WRAPPED PORK SIRLOIN FILLETS | TENDERLOIN 100% GRASS FED BEEF FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 150 MG | 49 MG |