BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF vs CULINARY CUTS PRIME BEEF GROUND CHUCK BURGERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF: 5
vs
CULINARY CUTS PRIME BEEF GROUND CHUCK BURGERS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF | CULINARY CUTS PRIME BEEF GROUND CHUCK BURGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 183 cal | 293 cal | |
| Protein | 16.9 g | 15.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12.7 g | 25.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF | CULINARY CUTS PRIME BEEF GROUND CHUCK BURGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF | CULINARY CUTS PRIME BEEF GROUND CHUCK BURGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 20 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 585 MG | 66 MG |