BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF vs BEEF TENDERLOIN STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF: 5
vs
BEEF TENDERLOIN STEAK: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF | BEEF TENDERLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 183 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 16.9 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12.7 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF | BEEF TENDERLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF | BEEF TENDERLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 585 MG | 49 MG | |
| Zinc, Zn | 0 MG | 3.4 MG |