BACON RANCH DRESSING vs BETTY CROCKER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BETTY CROCKER wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BACON RANCH DRESSING: 2
vs
BETTY CROCKER: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON RANCH DRESSING | BETTY CROCKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 42.9 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 14.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON RANCH DRESSING | BETTY CROCKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON RANCH DRESSING | BETTY CROCKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 5.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 767 MG | 1,643 MG |