BACON RANCH DRESSING vs COLESLAW DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
BACON RANCH DRESSING: 3
vs
COLESLAW DRESSING: 1
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON RANCH DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 516 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 22.6 g | |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 48.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON RANCH DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON RANCH DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 767 MG | 1,194 MG |