BACON RANCH DRESSING vs AGED BALSAMIC
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
BACON RANCH DRESSING: 3
vs
AGED BALSAMIC: 1
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON RANCH DRESSING | AGED BALSAMIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 367 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON RANCH DRESSING | AGED BALSAMIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON RANCH DRESSING | AGED BALSAMIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 117 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,000 MG | 417 MG |