BACON & CHEDDAR CHICKEN SAUSAGE vs TRADITIONAL SAUCISSE DE CANARD A L'ARMAGNAC (DUCK & ARMAGNAC SAUSAGE)
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON & CHEDDAR CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BACON & CHEDDAR CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 6
vs
TRADITIONAL SAUCISSE DE CANARD A L'ARMAGNAC (DUCK & ARMAGNAC SAUSAGE): 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON & CHEDDAR CHICKEN SAUSAGE | TRADITIONAL SAUCISSE DE CANARD A L'ARMAGNAC (DUCK & ARMAGNAC SAUSAGE) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 198 cal | 383 cal | |
| Protein | 20.9 g | 11.7 g | |
| Carbs | 2.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12.1 g | 36.7 g | |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON & CHEDDAR CHICKEN SAUSAGE | TRADITIONAL SAUCISSE DE CANARD A L'ARMAGNAC (DUCK & ARMAGNAC SAUSAGE) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON & CHEDDAR CHICKEN SAUSAGE | TRADITIONAL SAUCISSE DE CANARD A L'ARMAGNAC (DUCK & ARMAGNAC SAUSAGE) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 88 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 901 MG | 750 MG |