BACK TO NATURE vs NANTUCKET BLEND
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACK TO NATURE wins in 4 out of 14 nutrient categories
BACK TO NATURE: 4
vs
NANTUCKET BLEND: 1
(9 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACK TO NATURE | NANTUCKET BLEND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 433 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 10 g | 10 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 53.3 g | 53.3 g | Tie |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 26.7 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACK TO NATURE | NANTUCKET BLEND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACK TO NATURE | NANTUCKET BLEND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 133 MG | Tie |
| Copper, Cu | 0.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 2.4 MG | Tie |
| Magnesium, Mg | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Manganese, Mn | 1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 500 MG | 500 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 17 MG | 0 MG |