BACK TO NATURE vs THE ORIGINAL MARSHMALLOW SANDWICH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACK TO NATURE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BACK TO NATURE: 5
vs
THE ORIGINAL MARSHMALLOW SANDWICH: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACK TO NATURE | THE ORIGINAL MARSHMALLOW SANDWICH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 484 cal | 386 cal | |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 5.3 g | |
| Carbs | 67.7 g | 68.4 g | |
| Fat | 22.6 g | 10.5 g | |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACK TO NATURE | THE ORIGINAL MARSHMALLOW SANDWICH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACK TO NATURE | THE ORIGINAL MARSHMALLOW SANDWICH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.5 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 258 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 516 MG | 316 MG |