BACK TO NATURE vs GRAHAM CRACKER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
BACK TO NATURE: 4
vs
GRAHAM CRACKER: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACK TO NATURE | GRAHAM CRACKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 484 cal | 385 cal | |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 7.7 g | |
| Carbs | 67.7 g | 69.2 g | |
| Fat | 22.6 g | 7.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACK TO NATURE | GRAHAM CRACKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACK TO NATURE | GRAHAM CRACKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.5 MG | 2.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 258 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 516 MG | 538 MG |