BABY BACK PORK RIBS vs CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BABY BACK PORK RIBS: 3
vs
CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BABY BACK PORK RIBS | CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 214 cal | 121 cal | |
| Protein | 15 g | 17.1 g | |
| Carbs | 14.3 g | 2.9 g | |
| Fat | 10.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BABY BACK PORK RIBS | CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BABY BACK PORK RIBS | CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 7 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 389 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 321 MG | 321 MG | Tie |