ATLANTIC SHORES vs NANG FAH (TUE KUNG)
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ATLANTIC SHORES wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
ATLANTIC SHORES: 7
vs
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG): 1
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ATLANTIC SHORES | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 cal | 260 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ATLANTIC SHORES | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 12 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ATLANTIC SHORES | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 88 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 292 MG | 260 MG |