ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB vs ALASKAN COHO WILD CAUGHT SALMON FULL SIDE FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALASKAN COHO WILD CAUGHT SALMON FULL SIDE FILLET wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB: 1
vs
ALASKAN COHO WILD CAUGHT SALMON FULL SIDE FILLET: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB | ALASKAN COHO WILD CAUGHT SALMON FULL SIDE FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 232 cal | 150 cal | |
| Protein | 19.0 g | 22.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 16.2 g | 6.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB | ALASKAN COHO WILD CAUGHT SALMON FULL SIDE FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB | ALASKAN COHO WILD CAUGHT SALMON FULL SIDE FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 425 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 85 MG | 44 MG |