ASIAGO BAKED SNACK CRACKERS vs FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
ASIAGO BAKED SNACK CRACKERS: 3
vs
FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ASIAGO BAKED SNACK CRACKERS | FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 464 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 63.3 g | 67.9 g | |
| Fat | 23.3 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ASIAGO BAKED SNACK CRACKERS | FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ASIAGO BAKED SNACK CRACKERS | FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 767 MG | 304 MG |