ARGENTINE RED SHRIMP vs SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ARGENTINE RED SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
ARGENTINE RED SHRIMP: 6
vs
SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ARGENTINE RED SHRIMP | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 87 cal | 88 cal | |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 18.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ARGENTINE RED SHRIMP | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ARGENTINE RED SHRIMP | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 112 MG | 75 MG |