ARANCINI vs FULLY COOKED PORK MEATBALLS WITH MAPLE & BACON SEASONING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FULLY COOKED PORK MEATBALLS WITH MAPLE & BACON SEASONING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ARANCINI: 4
vs
FULLY COOKED PORK MEATBALLS WITH MAPLE & BACON SEASONING: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ARANCINI | FULLY COOKED PORK MEATBALLS WITH MAPLE & BACON SEASONING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 256 cal | 318 cal | |
| Protein | 4.7 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 32.6 g | 8.2 g | |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 23.5 g | |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ARANCINI | FULLY COOKED PORK MEATBALLS WITH MAPLE & BACON SEASONING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ARANCINI | FULLY COOKED PORK MEATBALLS WITH MAPLE & BACON SEASONING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 93 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 235 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 186 MG | 918 MG |