APPLE & MAPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE MINI LINKS vs BEEF POLISH SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
APPLE & MAPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE MINI LINKS wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
APPLE & MAPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE MINI LINKS: 6
vs
BEEF POLISH SAUSAGE: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | APPLE & MAPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE MINI LINKS | BEEF POLISH SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 179 cal | 338 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 11.7 g | |
| Carbs | 12.5 g | 3.9 g | |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 29.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | APPLE & MAPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE MINI LINKS | BEEF POLISH SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | APPLE & MAPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE MINI LINKS | BEEF POLISH SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 268 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 786 MG | 1,026 MG |