ANIMAL COOKIES vs FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ANIMAL COOKIES wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
ANIMAL COOKIES: 8
vs
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES: 1
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ANIMAL COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 383 cal | 448 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 69.0 g | |
| Fat | 10 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ANIMAL COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 10 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ANIMAL COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 33 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 7.2 MG | 3.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 500 MG | 172 MG |