ANGUS BEEF BRISKET vs BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ANGUS BEEF BRISKET wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
ANGUS BEEF BRISKET: 6
vs
BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ANGUS BEEF BRISKET | BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 157 cal | 220 cal | |
| Protein | 26.5 g | 14.0 g | |
| Carbs | 1.0 g | 23.1 g | |
| Fat | 4.9 g | 9.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ANGUS BEEF BRISKET | BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ANGUS BEEF BRISKET | BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 20 MG | 125 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.7 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 72 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 618 MG | 1 MG |