ALMOND vs BUTTERED DOUBLE SUCCOTASH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALMOND wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ALMOND: 5
vs
BUTTERED DOUBLE SUCCOTASH: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALMOND | BUTTERED DOUBLE SUCCOTASH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 613 cal | 85 cal | |
| Protein | 19.4 g | 3.1 g | |
| Carbs | 16.1 g | 15.4 g | |
| Fat | 54.8 g | 1.9 g | |
| Fiber | 9.7 g | 2.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALMOND | BUTTERED DOUBLE SUCCOTASH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALMOND | BUTTERED DOUBLE SUCCOTASH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 258 MG | 20 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.5 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 217 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 710 MG | 300 MG |