ALMOND PISTACHIO BISCOTTI THINS vs CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALMOND PISTACHIO BISCOTTI THINS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ALMOND PISTACHIO BISCOTTI THINS: 5
vs
CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALMOND PISTACHIO BISCOTTI THINS | CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 60 g | 73.3 g | |
| Fat | 13.3 g | 13.3 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALMOND PISTACHIO BISCOTTI THINS | CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALMOND PISTACHIO BISCOTTI THINS | CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 133 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 167 MG | 100 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 233 MG | 833 MG |