ALMOND vs MARSHMALLOW CHICKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALMOND wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
ALMOND: 6
vs
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALMOND | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 462 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 64.1 g | 85.7 g | |
| Fat | 20.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALMOND | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALMOND | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 103 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 205 MG | 36 MG |