ALMOND vs SLOW-BAKED CHICKEN BAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW-BAKED CHICKEN BAR wins in 8 out of 14 nutrient categories
ALMOND: 4
vs
SLOW-BAKED CHICKEN BAR: 8
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALMOND | SLOW-BAKED CHICKEN BAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 475 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 22.5 g | 33.3 g | |
| Carbs | 27.5 g | 30 g | |
| Fat | 30 g | 8.3 g | |
| Fiber | 5 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALMOND | SLOW-BAKED CHICKEN BAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 13.3 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 0.4 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALMOND | SLOW-BAKED CHICKEN BAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 145 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 535 MG | 633 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 262 MG | 633 MG |